Whatever You Do, Don't Expel
Arafat!
By Ariel Natan Pasko
Recently Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has been calling for Arafat's expulsion. In fact,
at a Likud Party convention (Nov. 12), Netanyahu promised, if elected Prime Minister, one of the first things he would do is expel Yasser
Arafat. Many on the Right in Israel over the last couple of years, have called for Arafat's expulsion. The Yesha Council (of towns in Judea,
Samaria, and Gaza), about a year ago (Oct. 22, 2001), organized a rally in Jerusalem with the slogan, "Expel Arafat, Fight Terror". But there
are contrary opinions, for example Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz. He agrees with Prime Minister Sharon that it isn't worth risking good
relations with the United States, and has stated his opposition to expelling Arafat.
There are other voices, voices of commentators
and politicians who neither want Arafat expelled, nor left alone. What comes to mind are those who have said recently that Arafat should be
tried for murder (Alan Dershowitz-"Put Arafat On Trial"), or put on trial like Eichmann (myself- "An Eichmann Trial For Arafat" and Effi
Eitam), or simply killed. Effi Eitam, after calling for a trial, later moved to "Take him out and shoot him". MK Michael Kleiner said that the
army should have "bombed Arafat's compound in Ramallah with him inside". And Prof. Steven Plaut ("The Case For Killing Arafat") asks, "So
what does Israel have to lose from killing Arafat?"
But the absolutely worst idea of the bunch (and I think leaving him alone is
pretty bad) is expelling him. I'll tell you why. Because once in 'exile' Arafat will be back where he started. Free from under our control
to campaign for a Palestinian State; free to play 'victim', free to organize terror acts on a scale yet unknown; imagine for a moment, Yasser
Arafat will have total free access to media interviews. Why should Israel give it to him? And what if, at a later date, a different type of
government comes to power in Israel and brings Arafat back again (like Rabin did with Hamas in 1992-93)? Will we have to watch on the TV,
Arafat's triumphant return to 'Palestine' for the second time? Forget it! There is another solution.
I have to admit that Israel
hasn't yet been 'too smart' in dealing with him. When we had him locked up in the Mukatah compound for months, we should have cut all access
to the media and visitors. Heck, in the middle ages, they would have just dumped him in the dungeon (if they didn't kill him). Locked away
for years, without any sight or sound of him, new leaders would have arisen to fill the power vacuum. That's how to make him irrelevant.
Contrast that to letting him roam free in 'exile'. The only value to sending him out of the country is, if Israel intends to quietly 'bump
him off', making it look, like another Arab/Islamic state or terror group did it, and denying it later.
Let me state clearly, I
don't support the 'extra-judicial' killing of Arafat. If an Israeli Prime Minister has the political strength and moral courage to 'exile'
Arafat; if he's ready to 'take the heat' from the world, for the sake of the Jewish People & Israel; then Yasser Arafat should be arrested &
tried for Crimes Against Humanity, i.e. the Jewish People, Lebanese, Americans, and others. He should be tried in Jerusalem like Eichmann was,
and put to death. An example of how to deal with terrorism should be made of him, to the world, in the bright light of day, in the dawn of
Israel's new beginning.
For those a little squeamish among you, I want to remind you of an important 'TRUISM'. No matter how
much the world screams foul, in two weeks, there are new headlines. So, don't worry.
No matter what Israel does do, DON'T EXPELL
ARAFAT!
(c)2002/5763 Pasko